search
Search
 
Image © Andy Horstmanshoff
 

In the Spotlight

Rules have changed, miners say; neighbors, environmentalists wary

October 20, 2011. RGJ: "http://www.rgj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2011110210345"

Mining has a conflicted history in Mason Valley. While it has provided steady work from 1915 to 1978, the land was left with an open scar after mining operations ceased--the massive Yerington pit. It's about a mile long, 800 feet deep and half full of water.

 
The new copper run: Yerington mining plans could bring hundreds of jobs

October 17, 2011. RGJ: "http://www.rgj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2011110160377"

Yerington looks a little rough around the edges. The small city with a population of about 3,000, the Lyon County sister city to Fernley, could be the poster-child town of rural Nevada for the state's ongoing recession, considered the worst in state history.

 
Mt. Tenabo on Trial

October 06, 2011. Associated Press: "Tribe battles BLM over Nev. gold mine in US court"

RENO, Nev. — Lawyers for environmentalists and several Nevada tribes urged a federal judge Thursday to keep in place restrictions from a 2009 court order that blocks the expansion of a gold mine at the base of a mountain that some Western Shoshone consider sacred.

 
Yerington Anaconda Mine

February 15, 2011. Associated Press: "Toxic Nevada mine lawsuit seeks $5M from BP, ARCO"

RENO, Nev. -- Neighbors of a toxic mine in northern Nevada have filed a class-action lawsuit against BP America and Atlantic Richfield Co. accusing them of intentionally and negligently concealing the extent of the contamination leaking off the abandoned site for decades.

 
Nevada Legislature

High Time to End this Gift to the Mining Industry.  February 16, 2011.  Las Vegas Sun: "Line of questioning a bad sign for mining industry" Senate Bill 86 to revise Eminent Domain Law

 
 
Ruby Pipeline Delayed E-mail

Ruby pipeline faces delay over historic site concerns

Posted: Sunday, May 30, 2010 12:00 am

Construction of a $3 billion gas pipeline from Wyoming to Oregon has been pushed back amid work to protect cultural sites and endangered species.

Houston-based El Paso Corp. initially hoped to begin work on the 42-inch Ruby Pipeline this spring. The BLM said it hopes to approve the project in early July, after the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission works out agreements with each state along the route to protect historic and cultural sites.

The pipeline will run 675 miles from Opal in western Wyoming to Malin, Ore., crossing Utah and Nevada along the way. The project is scheduled to pass through unincorporated Cache County south of Avon. The Cache County Council had previously issued a conditional use permit

for the pipeline conditional on FERC approval.

As of last month, Cache County planning officials were working with El Paso on a development agreement to ensure that county roads would be repaired if damaged in the installation of the pipeline. At the time, county officials said they believed work on the project would start by the end of the summer.

FERC has drafted agreements with the state historic preservation offices in Utah and Wyoming and should have agreements for the other two states soon, said Mark Mackiewicz, manager of the project for the BLM in Utah.

“It’s a big step at least getting those two states completed,” he said Friday.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is working on a plan to protect endangered species. The BLM can approve the project following approval of the various agencies, Mackiewicz said, perhaps in July.

El Paso spokesman Richard Wheatley said he hopes the project isn’t much delayed.

“We’re hoping it will get going as soon as possible subject to the approvals we still have outstanding,” he said.

Final approval for construction will come from the Office of Energy Projects in FERC.

Some environmental groups oppose the pipeline. The route crosses too many undeveloped lands when the pipeline could be built along highways and other developed corridors, said Katie Fite, with Hailey, Idaho-based Western Wastern Watersheds Project.

“Basically they’re opening up this remote and undisturbed area with this pipeline route,” said Fite.

Western Watersheds Project filed a motion for a rehearing following FERC approval of the pipeline proposal in April. FERC has one more week to either grant the motion or take no action on it, in which case the motion would be dead.

Fite said her group hadn’t heard back yet from FERC.

The Ruby Pipeline is expected to create 5,000 to 6,000 construction jobs. Once built, the pipeline will employ as many as 10 people at each of four compressor stations along the route.

link to story

 



>Take the Toxic Tour
and learn more about how our communities are being impacted by mining in our own back yards.

Communities

Connect With GBRW

facebook twitter

 

© 2012 Great Basin Resource Watch
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU General Public License.